![]() (If you had to click that link to figure out what keybounce is, I don't blame you.)īy contrast, OpenBSD installed without a hitch under virt-manager. It couldn't successfully find its own files on the virtual CD it had booted from, it didn't quite understand the network stack (interpreting its IP address as static rather than DHCP), and it had incredibly bad keybounce. OpenBSD's installer is quite primitive and couldn't cope with some of the choices Boxes had made for its environment. This seemed to go well at first-it downloaded the ISO quickly, and jumped right into an installation-but the installation itself had severe problems, and I never got a working guest out of it. I skipped down past OpenSUSE and went directly to OpenBSD, which I'd never run before. Searching for OpenBSD under the Create VM dialog went extremely well-as I typed "open" into the search box, it dynamically populated the list of known distros with matching results. ![]() When we tested an Ubuntu Focal Fossa guest, the guest's video resolution changed dynamically and automatically as we resized its window on the host operating system-and files dragged from the host's file explorer onto the Boxes window were automatically transferred into the guest, where they showed up in the logged-in user's Downloads folder. The extra integration is most evident when running Linux guests (virtual machines), where virtio drivers are always available and libvirt integration is at a maximum. Instead of needing to google "OpenBSD" to find a download link, a Boxes user can just start typing "open" into a search field and immediately see a list of OpenSUSE and OpenBSD versions. Most popular-and even not-so-popular-guest operating systems are available in Boxes as a built-in download direct from the source. This effort at greater integration begins before a new virtual machine is even running. This desktop-focused approach may begin with trimming away advanced options, but it doesn't end there-Boxes offers quite a few usability tweaks that virt-manager doesn't, and likely won't. Instead, Boxes focuses on getting things working out of the box with very little input from user. For this reason, Boxes does not provide many of the advanced options to tweak virtual machines provided by virt-manager. ![]() Virt-manager exposes those inner workings as much as possible while trying not to get them unnecessarily in the way.īoxes approaches the same problem from the opposite direction-it abstracts away as much as possible, with no apologies for doing so.īoxes is targeted towards a typical desktop end-user who wants either a very safe and easy way to try out new operating systems or new (potentially unstable) versions of her/his favorite operating system(s), or needs to connect to a remote machine (home-office connection being a typical use-case). Under the hood, Boxes shares the majority of its technical underpinnings with virt-manager: the libvirt virtualization API, the Linux Kernel Virtual Machine (KVM) hypervisor, and the qemu generic processor emulator.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |